A Further Thai Review of Sardines

Sardines delivers a strange yet highly intriguing opening to the Inside No9 series, pulling viewers in with its unusual plot and disturbingly unforgettable twist; some viewers may have difficulty sleeping after watching. You've been warned! The episode throws more than ten characters into a bedroom wardrobe, immediately creating a sense of forced closeness that feels awkward, tense, and deeply uncomfortable. This cramped setting doesn’t just grab attention—it drives the entire story. The characters literally pack together like sardines, and the pressure of the space makes every conversation sharper and every secret harder to hide.

Although the setup looks like a comedy at first, Sardines quickly reveals that the relationships in the room are far more complicated than expected. The overlapping dialogue and the confusion caused by imposters like Ian (or should that be Pip) add to the chaotic energy, and while some viewers may find this hard to follow, others can enjoy the challenge of working out who is who. The crowded wardrobe creates moments that are both funny and awkward, but it also lets darker uncomfortable truths rise to the surface.

As the characters talk, the playful tone starts to twist into something more unsettling. The episode slowly uncovers a shocking history of systemic trauma and abuse linked to Andrew, and the tension becomes increasingly hard to ignore. Philip—who first appears as a calm, bored guest—reveals himself as a psychopath waiting for the “tin” to be full before taking his revenge.

Despite some confusing sections, Sardines stands out as a cleverly structured, dark, and claustrophobic story. It blends humor, mystery, and rising tension with impressive skill, delivering a final twist that leaves a strong and lasting impression.

Generated by ChatGPT from reviews by

Angsana Danthong
Chakrabongse Vichitrapraphavongse
Chutinat Chuaycheep
Evangeline Peh
Itsara Chanthawong
Jintaporn Muensaen
Jirakit
Kantarakorn Poonsawad
Karistha Supawan
Kattareeya Kitchapor
Khemmapich Sriwittayanan
Khanobkun Sappan
Kritsapol Numhom
Kunlaporn Techupakorn
Lakkana Sangwaraporn
Montapa Poyenyate
Muzeera
Nadeeyah Samaaechema
Napalisaa
Navaratah Phasathan
Panupong Pukeaw
Pasnarin
Phramahathanat
Piyamas Sopaladawan
Sarunyaphak Sangiemwattana
Sinatcha Rungroj
Siraphat Wittawatkul
Siriwimon Kajornkidakarn
Suwanee Boonsalee
Supanan Ninket
Thanachot
Thanatip
Thani Phatto
Varin Krailop
Wichittra Rodrit
Yadasumon Danwongsa
Yanisa

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More Insights from Thailand: Another Collective View of Sardines

Following a viewing of Inside No. 9's Sardines by around 70 Thai students, they all wrote short reviews. These then formed the basis of group reviews submitted to ChatGPT with the instructions to synthesise, only use content contained in the reviews and to maintain as much of the original review language as possible. The result was the following. “Sardines” is a clever and creepy episode of Inside No. 9 that starts off as a funny party game and slowly becomes something much darker. Set almost entirely inside a small, stuffy wardrobe, the episode uses its confined setting to build tension and discomfort—emotionally, visually, and psychologically. As more characters enter the space, we begin to feel that we are like sardines in a can, and the emotional pressure builds along with the physical. At first, the story seems like a light comedy. There are polite but awkward interactions, a strange game of hide and seek, and a cast of diverse characters. The tone is weird and funny, with m...
Read more

Google Scholar and Multiple Wildcard Searches

Image
This post by Chris Ireland is about conducting Searches in Google Scholar and making use of multiple wildcards to quickly identify useful sources. Despite its title, ‘Google Scholar’ is often viewed with scepticism, with its usefulness as an academic research tool being one issue often raised (Le & Nguyen, 2022) and its efficiency in finding suitable sources another (Loan & Sheikh, 2018) . Indeed, concern  over the quality of the results it produces have often been highlighted  with its comprehensive system of indexing, which relies entirely on automated processes and therefore allows some non-scholarly sources through ( Harzing , 2020), compared to more selective databases which, unlike Google Scholar, often maintain some human intervention (Gray et al., 2012). However, despite these criticisms Google Scholar is widely reported as being the largest academic search engine or database ( Gusenbauer , 2019; Octavianus & Fachrudin , 2022) and considered  as t...
Read more